Neighbours Fume Over 'Deceptive' House Listing: Can YOU Spot the Hidden Problem?
Neighbours fury over 'deceptive' house listing in Stoke

A seemingly normal property listing has ignited fury among neighbours who claim the advertisement is deliberately misleading potential buyers. The three-bedroom terraced house on Rightmove appears typical at first glance, but locals insist there's a significant problem the listing conveniently omits.

The Hidden Issue You Might Miss

While the online advert showcases a modernised interior with contemporary decor, neighbours quickly identified what they're calling a "deliberate deception." The property photographs carefully avoid showing the exterior of the adjacent property, which reveals the house is actually a mid-terrace property sandwiched between two abandoned, boarded-up homes.

Neighbours Speak Out Against 'Cheating' Listing

Residents of the street have expressed outrage at the listing, accusing the seller of attempting to pull the wool over buyers' eyes. One neighbour stated: "It's cheating people. They're not showing the derelict houses either side which are all boarded up."

Another local added: "You would have no idea from the pictures that the houses either side are abandoned. It's completely misleading."

Property Details and Pricing Controversy

The house, located on Willfield Road in Stoke-on-Trent, is listed for £140,000 and described as having been "refurbished throughout" with a "modern finish." The listing boasts three bedrooms, a lounge, and a refurbished bathroom.

However, critics argue the asking price is unreasonable given the property's unfortunate positioning between two derelict buildings, which significantly impacts both its aesthetic appeal and potential security concerns.

Broader Implications for Property Listings

This incident raises important questions about transparency in property advertising. While sellers naturally want to present their homes in the best light, neighbours argue there's a line between highlighting features and actively concealing major drawbacks.

Property experts suggest that while it's not illegal to avoid photographing unattractive neighbouring properties, ethical considerations should come into play when such factors substantially affect a property's value and livability.

The controversy serves as a reminder for potential buyers to always conduct thorough due diligence, including visiting properties in person and researching the surrounding area, rather than relying solely on online listings and carefully curated photographs.