
A furious Atlanta homeowner has launched a scathing attack on the charity Habitat for Humanity, accusing them of constructing a 'monstrosity' that has ruined his property and shattered his peace.
Brian Evans claims his once-tranquil backyard on Joseph Court in southwest Atlanta is now dominated by the looming presence of a new two-storey house built just 12 feet from his property line. The construction, he says, has blocked precious sunlight, destroyed his privacy, and will likely cause a significant drop in his home's value.
‘They’ve Built a Monstrosity’
‘They’ve built a monstrosity,’ Evans told DailyMail.com. ‘It’s completely changed the dynamic of my home. My backyard was my sanctuary, and now it’s gone. It’s an eyesore that’s literally in my backyard.’
The heart of the dispute lies in the lot itself. Evans alleges the non-profit organisation exploited a loophole by building on a subdivided lot that should never have been approved for such a large structure. He insists the project violates the area's zoning laws, which typically require much larger setbacks from property boundaries.
A Charity Under Fire
Habitat for Humanity, famed for its mission of providing affordable housing, is now facing accusations of disregarding the very communities it aims to help. Evans feels betrayed that a charitable organisation would proceed with a project that so negatively impacts an existing resident.
‘You would think a charity would have more compassion and would want to be a better neighbour,’ he stated. ‘This isn’t about being against affordable housing; it’s about them doing it the wrong way and not following the rules.’
Fight for Justice and Property Value
Evans is now embroiled in a frustrating battle with local planning authorities, arguing that the construction permit should never have been granted. He fears the immense structure will scare away potential buyers and has already caused irreparable harm to his investment.
‘This is my biggest investment,’ Evans explained. ‘I’ve put my blood, sweat, and tears into this home. For a organisation to come in and just diminish that value and take away the enjoyment of my property is just wrong.’
Despite his repeated attempts to resolve the issue, he claims his complaints have fallen on deaf ears, leaving him to consider legal action to protect his home and his rights as a homeowner.