A Muslim recruitment professional has emerged victorious in a significant religious discrimination case against a major UK government department, uncovering a culture of intolerance and victimisation.
The London Central employment tribunal ruled that Ms Hina Hafesjee, a recruitment manager at the Government Legal Department (GLD), was subjected to a sustained campaign of religious harassment and was unfairly victimised after raising complaints.
A Pattern of Discriminatory Behaviour
The tribunal heard disturbing evidence of Islamophobic comments and behaviour directed at Ms Hafesjee. Colleagues openly mocked Islamic practices, with one manager callously joking about her fasting during Ramadan, suggesting she was "starving herself to death."
In a particularly egregious incident, a senior colleague crudely mimicked the Muslim call to prayer within the office environment, creating a humiliating and hostile atmosphere for the practising Muslim woman.
Retaliation for Speaking Out
When Ms Hafesjee courageously raised formal complaints about the discriminatory treatment, she faced immediate retaliation rather than support. The tribunal found she was subsequently sidelined, excluded from important meetings, and subjected to increased scrutiny and criticism of her work.
This victimisation created an unbearable working environment that ultimately forced her to leave her position, the panel concluded.
Tribunal's Damning Findings
Employment Judge Andrew Gumbiti-Zimuto delivered a scathing verdict, stating the GLD had failed in its duty to protect Ms Hafesjee from religious harassment. The tribunal found multiple instances of direct religious discrimination and a clear failure to address the hostile environment.
The judge noted that the department's investigation into her complaints was fundamentally flawed and inadequate, further compounding the injustice she experienced.
Substantial Compensation Awarded
Following the successful claim, Ms Hafesjee was awarded substantial compensation for injury to feelings, lost earnings, and aggravated damages. The case serves as a stark warning to employers about their legal obligations to protect staff from religious discrimination and harassment.
This landmark ruling highlights the ongoing challenges faced by religious minorities in the workplace and the critical importance of robust equality policies and their proper implementation.
