Labour Considers Controversial Employment Tribunal Fees for Workers
Labour may charge workers for employment tribunal claims

The Labour government is reportedly considering controversial plans to charge workers fees for bringing employment tribunal claims, according to sources close to the discussions.

This potential policy shift marks a significant departure from the party's traditional stance on workers' rights and could see employees facing financial barriers when seeking justice for workplace disputes.

Return of Tribunal Fees Sparks Concern

Insiders suggest that ministers are examining various options for implementing a fee system, though the specific structure and cost levels remain undecided. The move comes despite the Supreme Court's 2017 ruling that declared the previous Conservative government's tribunal fee regime unlawful.

Employment experts and trade unions have expressed alarm at the proposals, warning that any form of charging could prevent vulnerable workers from pursuing legitimate claims against employers.

Balancing Access and Resources

Supporters of the measure argue that a modest fee system could help manage the tribunal service's resources more effectively while discouraging frivolous claims. However, critics counter that even nominal fees would create significant obstacles for low-paid workers.

The debate centres on finding a balance between maintaining access to justice and ensuring the sustainability of the employment tribunal system, which has faced increasing pressure in recent years.

Historical Context and Future Implications

The previous tribunal fee system, introduced in 2013, was found to have reduced claims by up to 70% before being struck down. Labour's potential revival of similar measures would represent a dramatic policy reversal and could trigger significant opposition from within the party and trade union movement.

As discussions continue behind closed doors, workers' rights organisations are preparing for what could become a major battleground in employment law reform.