Washington House Leader Apologises After Being Drunk at Budget Meeting
Washington House Majority Leader Joe Fitzgibbon, a Democrat representing West Seattle, has issued a formal apology after being caught visibly intoxicated during a critical State House budget committee meeting. The incident occurred during a Wednesday night session of the House Appropriations Committee, where Fitzgibbon was observed slurring his words, struggling to maintain coherence, and nearly falling asleep.
Impaired Performance During Crucial Proceedings
Multiple witnesses reported that Fitzgibbon appeared significantly impaired throughout the meeting. He was seen awkwardly pausing and stuttering during his speech, with his eyelids drooping as he fought to stay awake. At one point, while discussing taxpayer expenses, he dragged out his words in a manner that raised immediate concerns among colleagues.
Four Republican lawmakers later confirmed to local media that Fitzgibbon was clearly drunk and described him as hammered. One source noted, He was sleeping, quite a bit during the meeting. Lets just say someone said they weren’t sure if he’d pass a field sobriety test. I've never seen him like that before. Another legislator agreed, stating the behaviour was very out of character for the normally composed leader.
Public Apology and Regret
In a statement released to Seattle Red, Fitzgibbon admitted to being impaired during the meeting after consuming alcohol beforehand. He expressed deep regret, calling it a painful and embarrassing lesson that he vowed not to forget. I am disappointed in myself and take responsibility for that poor choice. It won’t happen again, and I’m committed to completing my work this session without alcohol, he declared.
The budget hearing concluded shortly after 10pm, but the fallout continues as questions arise about potential disciplinary action. While Fitzgibbon has apologised, it remains unclear whether formal consequences will follow from legislative authorities or his party.
Broader Implications and Reactions
This incident has sparked discussions about professionalism and accountability in government settings, particularly during high-stakes budget discussions. Fitzgibbon's admission highlights the personal and political risks associated with such behaviour, especially for a majority leader in a position of significant influence.
As the story develops, observers are watching to see how this affects legislative proceedings and public trust. Fitzgibbon's commitment to alcohol-free work for the remainder of the session is noted, but the episode serves as a stark reminder of the scrutiny faced by public officials.
