The Metropolitan Police Service is facing renewed criticism over its handling of sexual offence allegations against Prince Andrew, following revelations that Virginia Giuffre's claims against the Duke of York were never formally investigated.
Despite Giuffre's detailed accounts of her experiences with the royal and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Scotland Yard confirmed no official inquiry was ever launched into the allegations that have rocked the monarchy.
Years of Allegations Ignored
Court documents from Giuffre's settled civil case against Prince Andrew described the Metropolitan Police's approach as "a continuing failure to act" on credible evidence. The force has repeatedly stated it would review any "new and significant" information, yet multiple opportunities to interview key figures have passed without action.
A Met spokesperson stated: "We remain committed to investigating allegations of sexual offences where there is evidence to do so. No investigation has been launched into the Duke of York, and we would not comment further on the specifics of this case."
Pattern of Police Inaction
This isn't the first time the Metropolitan Police has faced questions about its handling of the Epstein scandal. Previous opportunities to investigate British connections to the financier's sex trafficking network were similarly missed, despite victims coming forward with information.
Legal experts suggest the failure to even interview Prince Andrew raises serious questions about equality before the law. "When allegations of this seriousness are made, they demand proper investigation regardless of who is involved," said human rights lawyer Jennifer Robinson.
Royal Reputation in Tatters
The ongoing scandal has severely damaged Prince Andrew's public standing, leading to his removal from royal duties and the stripping of military affiliations and royal patronages. Buckingham Palace has consistently denied the allegations on his behalf.
The controversy continues to cast a shadow over the monarchy, with republican groups citing the case as evidence of privileged treatment for senior royals within the justice system.
