Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has launched a blistering attack on Labour peer Peter Mandelson, publicly branding him a "first-class hypocrite" for his past associations with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his use of private air travel.
The political firestorm erupted during a live BBC debate on immigration, where Farage seized the opportunity to confront Mandelson directly over his criticisms of Reform's policies. The exchange turned deeply personal as Farage referenced Mandelson's numerous flights aboard Epstein's private jet between 2005 and 2008.
Starmer Faces Awkward Questions Over Labour Links
The controversy has created significant embarrassment for Labour leader Keir Starmer, who now faces mounting pressure to address his party's connections to the disgraced financier. Mandelson, a key architect of New Labour and former Business Secretary, remains an influential figure within party circles.
Farage's intervention highlights the ongoing tension between Starmer's attempt to position Labour as the party of integrity and its historical associations with controversial figures. The Reform leader pointedly questioned how Mandelson could criticize others while having himself accepted luxury travel from a man convicted of serious sex offences.
Epstein Connections Continue to Haunt British Politics
The shadow of Jeffrey Epstein continues to loom over Westminster, with this latest exchange demonstrating how his associations remain politically potent. Mandelson's travels with Epstein occurred during the latter's period as a registered sex offender, following his 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor.
While Mandelson has previously stated he knew nothing of Epstein's crimes at the time of their association, Farage's very public accusation ensures this uncomfortable chapter remains in the political spotlight, potentially damaging Labour's carefully crafted image ahead of the general election.
The public nature of this accusation during a major television debate ensures that questions about political integrity and associations with controversial figures will remain central to the election campaign narrative.
