BBC Apologises to Trump Over Edited Speech But Rejects $1bn Compensation
BBC apologises to Trump but rejects $1bn compensation

BBC Issues Formal Apology Over Trump Speech Editing

The BBC has formally apologised to former US President Donald Trump for its editing of a Panorama programme that featured his speech from the day of the Capitol attack. The corporation's chair, Samir Shah, sent a personal letter to the White House expressing regret for how the president's 6 January 2021 address was edited in the documentary Trump: A Second Chance?.

The edited segment gave the impression of a direct call for violent action, according to Shah's admission. However, despite this apology, the BBC has firmly rejected Trump's demands for compensation, after the former president's lawyers threatened to sue for $1bn (£759m) in damages unless the corporation issued a retraction, apologised and settled.

Resignations and Internal Fallout

The controversy has already claimed significant scalps within the BBC leadership. Director General Tim Davie and BBC News chief Deborah Turness both resigned following the revelation of the edited speech. The programme, broadcast just one week before the US election, featured a spliced clip that appeared to show Trump telling supporters: "We're going to walk down to the Capitol and I'll be there with you, and we fight. We fight like hell."

These words were actually taken from sections of his speech that were delivered almost an hour apart. The editing decision created the false impression that Trump had directly linked the march to the Capitol with an immediate call to fight.

Systemic Bias Concerns Raised

The issue came to light through a memo from Michael Prescott, a former independent external adviser to the BBC's editorial guidelines and standards committee. Prescott's document suggested the edit was part of a pattern showing systemic bias at the corporation, though the BBC has denied these allegations.

Internally, opinions are divided about the significance of the edit. Some BBC staff argue it didn't substantially change the meaning of Trump's speech, while others acknowledge the problematic nature of splicing together distant segments of the address.

The controversy has extended beyond Panorama, with the Telegraph newspaper revealing that BBC's Newsnight programme had also edited the same Trump speech in a similar manner in 2022. That edit similarly combined the section where Trump urged supporters to walk to the Capitol building with his later "fight like hell" remarks, without alerting viewers to the cut.

Former White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney publicly criticised the BBC at the time for this editing approach, pointing out during a broadcast that the combined segments came from different parts of the speech.

Legal Standing Questioned

Legal experts have cast doubt on Trump's chances of success should he pursue legal action. The broadcast occurred too long ago for UK legal proceedings, and Florida's liberal libel laws would present significant hurdles for any case brought in Trump's home state. Additionally, Trump would need to prove he suffered actual damage from the programme.

The BBC maintains that while it regrets the editing approach, there is no valid basis for a defamation claim. The corporation has agreed not to rebroadcast the controversial Panorama episode on any of its platforms, but stands firm against the compensation demands.

This incident represents another significant challenge for the BBC's reputation, coming amid ongoing scrutiny of its editorial standards and political impartiality. How Trump and his legal team will respond to the BBC's partial apology and compensation rejection remains uncertain as this developing story continues.