UK Government Under Fire for Alleged 'Power Grab' in Scottish and Yorkshire Deals
UK government accused of devolution 'power grab'

The UK government is facing fierce criticism after reports emerged that it negotiated funding agreements directly with local councils in Scotland and Yorkshire, allegedly sidelining devolved administrations in the process.

According to sources, Westminster officials held private discussions with council leaders in these regions to agree on investment packages, bypassing the Scottish Government and Yorkshire devolution structures. This approach has raised serious concerns about the erosion of devolved powers.

Growing Tensions Over Devolution

The controversy comes amid increasing tensions between Westminster and devolved governments regarding decision-making authority. Critics argue these direct deals represent a worrying trend of centralisation, with one MSP describing them as "a blatant power grab."

In Scotland, the situation is particularly sensitive as the Scottish Government maintains that all funding discussions should go through established devolution channels. A spokesperson stated: "This undermines the very principles of devolution and shows disrespect for Scotland's democratic institutions."

Yorkshire Leaders Divided

In Yorkshire, reaction has been mixed. While some council leaders welcomed the direct funding as a pragmatic solution, others expressed concern about the long-term implications for regional decision-making.

One Yorkshire councilor told reporters: "We need investment, but not at the cost of our hard-won devolution settlement. This sets a dangerous precedent."

Government Defends Approach

A UK government spokesperson defended the policy, stating: "We're committed to levelling up across all parts of the UK. Sometimes this requires working directly with local authorities to deliver results quickly."

The spokesperson denied any intention to undermine devolution, adding: "We continue to work constructively with all devolved administrations while ensuring taxpayers' money is spent effectively."

Political analysts suggest this controversy reflects broader tensions in UK governance as the government seeks to implement its "levelling up" agenda while navigating complex devolution arrangements.