US Strikes in Nigeria and Syria: A 'Continuation' of Anti-IS Policy, Says Senior Republican
US Strikes in Nigeria and Syria: Anti-IS Policy 'Consistent'

A senior Republican figure in the United States has stated that recent American military actions in Nigeria and Syria align with a longstanding foreign policy objective: the combat against Islamic State extremism. This stance comes amidst scrutiny over the nature of the operations.

Strikes Represent Policy Continuity, Not Change

Mike Turner, a prominent congressman from Ohio serving on the House Armed Services Committee, addressed the issue directly. He asserted on Sunday that the strikes against militants linked to the Islamic State group are a direct "continuation of our conflict with [the Islamic State]".

Turner emphasised that the US approach has been "very consistent" across different theatres of conflict, including Iraq, Syria, and now Nigeria. He firmly denied suggestions that these actions signalled a new strategic direction for the use of military force in a potential second term for the former president.

"It's been, you know, around the world, Iraq, Syria. You're seeing it now in Nigeria," Turner remarked during an appearance on ABC's This Week programme.

Context of the Nigerian Operation and Aftermath

Turner's comments follow a significant military intervention by the Pentagon just days prior. On Saturday, a US cruise missile strike targeted terrorist camps in north-western Nigeria.

The aftermath was visible in the town of Offa, where photographic evidence showed destroyed structures, reportedly caused by falling debris from expended munitions. The strikes were aimed at unspecified militants affiliated with the Islamic State group operating within Nigeria.

In subsequent statements, the former president characterised the operation as a "Christmas present" for the militants, whom he labelled "butchers." He explicitly linked the action to the persecution of Christians in the region, stating he had warned Nigeria that such actions would provoke a US response.

Echoing this sentiment, former Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated on social media platform X that the message was clear: "the killing of innocent Christians in Nigeria (and elsewhere) must end." Hegseth added a foreboding note, declaring "More to come" in the fight against IS.

Broader Foreign Policy Consistency and the Ukraine War

Congressman Turner extended his argument about policy consistency to other global conflicts, notably Russia's war in Ukraine. He pointed to Russian strikes over the Christmas period as a stark reminder of the ongoing aggression.

"When we address the issue of whose side we're on, you can't be America first and be pro-Russia," Turner stated. He described Russia as a "self-declared adversary of the United States" that is "mercilessly killing Ukrainians and trying to take Ukrainian land."

In his view, the US position of seeking to end the war through support for Ukraine remains a correct and steady application of foreign policy, drawing a parallel with the continued campaign against Islamic State affiliates worldwide.

The developments underscore a persistent and global US military engagement against extremist groups, a strategy that key political figures insist transcends administrative changes and remains a fixed point in American defence policy.