SAS Veterans Quit as Labour's Troubles Bill Sparks National Security Fears
SAS veterans resign over Labour's Troubles Bill

Veterans of the UK's Special Forces are making a desperate plea to Members of Parliament, urging them to block new legislation that they fear will expose them to a lifetime of legal battles. The controversial Labour Troubles Bill returns to the House of Commons today, prompting significant military protests expected at Westminster.

Exodus of Elite Forces

The crisis in military morale has reached a critical point with eight highly experienced Senior Non-Commissioned Officers resigning from the SAS in just three months. This follows last week's revelation that applications to join the elite regiment have dramatically decreased, with officers citing fears about the lack of legal protection.

A recently retired SAS soldier, speaking anonymously, revealed the devastating personal impact. "Having been arrested and humiliated in front of my family on a number of occasions, on charges that were nothing more than rumour, I know first-hand the damage this is doing," he stated. He emphasised that some of the military's finest are leaving because the organisation can no longer support them properly.

Broader Military Backlash

The government has already repealed the Conservatives' Legacy Act, which previously blocked inquests and criminal investigations related to Northern Ireland and other conflict zones. Now, military leaders are expressing grave concerns about the new direction.

In an unprecedented move, nine four-star generals wrote to the Prime Minister last week, accusing the government of undermining the Army's effectiveness and creating what they describe as a 'national security threat'. General Sir Nick Parker warned that the Northern Ireland legislation would make military personnel fearful of future legal claims, potentially endangering their lives during operations.

The case of Soldier F has become a focal point in this debate. The former paratrooper, now in his seventies, faced what was described as a 'show trial' in Belfast concerning events on Bloody Sunday in 1972. After five weeks in court, he was cleared of all charges related to the deaths of two unarmed protesters and attempted murder of five others from over fifty years ago.

Protection Measures Questioned

The government insists it has included six protections for veterans in the new legislation, including anonymity at inquests and not requiring travel to Northern Ireland for hearings. However, veterans remain deeply sceptical.

The anonymous SAS veteran dismissed these measures as "disingenuous", noting that anonymity at an inquest does not provide protection in law. He also highlighted that IRA members could potentially benefit from the same protections meant for veterans, creating what many see as a moral equivalence between terrorists and those who served lawfully.

Armed Forces Minister Al Carns, a former Royal Marines officer, has faced criticism from veterans who feel he has failed the military community. The Mail's campaign for veteran protections has gathered significant public support, with a petition attracting 210,000 signatures.

Veterans are calling for legislation that would disapply the European Convention on Human Rights and Britain's own Human Rights Act from troops' actions while on active service.

Secretary of State for Northern Ireland Hilary Benn MP is expected to tell Parliament: "I want to make it very clear that there is no moral equivalence whatsoever between those members of the Armed Forces who acted lawfully in carrying out their duties, and members of paramilitary organisations responsible for barbaric acts of terrorism."

He emphasised the government's duty of care to veterans and stated that the Ministry of Defence will provide legal and welfare support to any veteran participating in legacy processes. However, with experienced special forces personnel already leaving and recruitment suffering, the damage to military morale appears to be already underway.