The Life of Chuck Review: Mike Flanagan's Ambitious Stephen King Adaptation Divides Critics
Mike Flanagan's 'The Life of Chuck' Divides Critics

Visionary horror director Mike Flanagan, the mastermind behind Netflix's The Haunting of Hill House and Midnight Mass, returns with his most ambitious project to date: a feature-length adaptation of Stephen King's enigmatic short story, The Life of Chuck. Premiering in UK cinemas this week, the film stars Tom Hiddleston in a career-defining performance that traverses genres and timelines.

A Triumphant Yet Divisive Cinematic Experiment

Flanagan's adaptation is structured as a triptych, telling Chuck's story in reverse chronological order. This bold narrative choice begins with the end of the world and concludes with Chuck's childhood, creating a poignant and melancholic exploration of memory and mortality. The non-linear approach has proven to be the film's most divisive element, captivating some audiences while leaving others perplexed.

Hiddleston's Tour-de-Force Performance

At the heart of the film is Tom Hiddleston's mesmerising portrayal of Charles 'Chuck' Krantz. He effortlessly guides the audience through three distinct phases of Chuck's life: a dying man in his thirties, a successful businessman in his prime, and an orphaned child discovering a terrifying secret in his attic. The supporting cast, including Mark Hamill and Chiwetel Ejiofor, provide solid foundations, but this is unmistakably Hiddleston's film.

More Philosophical Drama Than Traditional Horror

While Flanagan incorporates his signature atmospheric dread, The Life of Chuck leans more toward philosophical drama than outright horror. The film asks profound questions about legacy, the nature of reality, and what it means to have lived a good life. The horror elements serve as metaphor rather than shock value, making this one of King's most thoughtful adaptations to date.

A Must-See For Flanagan and King Devotees

Despite its challenging structure, The Life of Chuck stands as a testament to Flanagan's growing confidence as a filmmaker unafraid to take creative risks. It may not achieve the widespread appeal of more conventional King adaptations, but for those willing to engage with its complex narrative, it offers a deeply moving and intellectually satisfying experience that lingers long after the credits roll.

The film's UK release marks another milestone in Flanagan's mission to bring King's more nuanced works to the screen, proving that some stories deserve to be told differently.