Mastiff-Great Dane Cross Ordered Destroyed After Mauling Four-Year-Old Girl
Dog Ordered Destroyed After Mauling Four-Year-Old Girl

A dog that brutally mauled a four-year-old girl, leaving her permanently scarred, has been ordered to be destroyed by Warwick Crown Court. The court heard harrowing details of the unprovoked attack on Luna-Ann Forsyth, which occurred in August 2023 in Nuneaton.

Unprovoked and Vicious Attack

The incident took place when Junior, a Mastiff-Great Dane cross, escaped from a room where he had been confined at his owner's house on Vernons Lane. The dog jumped on Luna-Ann, who was visiting with her mother, Amy Hobson, and younger brother. His Honour Judge Matthew Walsh KC described the attack as "unprovoked, sudden, terrifying and vicious."

"He jumped up and he grabbed her face with his mouth and she screamed and he pulled her to the ground and stood over her and she was screaming again," the judge recounted. Luna's mother had to physically intervene by kicking the dog to free her child.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Severe Injuries and Lasting Impact

Luna-Ann suffered severe injuries that required two surgeries following the attack. The court was told that her life has been "changed forever" due to the physical and emotional scars. The bite was assessed on the Dunbar Dog Bite Scale, with experts debating whether it constituted a level three or level four injury, indicating significant harm.

PC Craig Leach, a dog legislation officer at Warwickshire Police, argued that the bite was a level four, noting that Junior held onto the child for several seconds. "The prognosis is poor because of the difficulty and danger of trying to teach applied inhibition in an adult, hard-biting dog," he explained, citing the scale's author.

Court Proceedings and Expert Testimony

During the hearing, dog behaviour expert Michael Barnett presented a report based on an assessment of Junior conducted in October 2024. Video footage showed the dog appearing stressed and refusing treats, though Barnett noted that Junior did not show aggression during the evaluation.

Barnett suggested that strict conditions could potentially mitigate the risk posed by Junior, but emphasized that this would require full compliance from the owner. However, Judge Walsh expressed skepticism, citing the owner's past actions.

Owner's Conduct and Legal Consequences

Junior's owner, Emma Callaghan, was previously sentenced after being found guilty of being in charge of a dog dangerously out of control causing injury. She received a three-month suspended prison sentence, 25 days of rehabilitation, and 250 hours of unpaid community work. Notably, no application was made to prevent her from owning dogs in the future.

The court heard that Callaghan allowed her partner to take the dog away after the attack to avoid police seizure, though Junior was returned the next day. Judge Walsh highlighted this as a factor in his assessment, along with Callaghan's failure to attend the recent hearing despite reported travel issues.

Judge's Rationale for Destruction Order

Judge Walsh concluded that Junior's behaviour was unpredictable and that the reason for the attack remained unknown. He noted that Junior had spent nearly three years in police kennels in solitary confinement, which would make reintegration into a household challenging.

"I cannot be satisfied that Junior would not pose a danger to public safety," the judge stated, ordering the destruction. He added that while conditions might reduce risk, they could not eliminate it sufficiently, especially given concerns about owner compliance.

The case underscores the severe consequences of dog attacks on children and the legal complexities involved in assessing dangerous animals. Luna-Ann's ordeal serves as a stark reminder of the importance of responsible pet ownership and public safety measures.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration