Fury as Council Splurges £4m on 'Bat Bridge' | Taxpayer Cash for Protected Species Sparks Outrage
Fury over £4m 'Bat Bridge' funded by taxpayers

A massive £4 million infrastructure project, dubbed the 'bat bridge', has become the centre of a furious political row in South East London. The costly crossing is not for commuters or cyclists, but is being built exclusively for protected wildlife, including bats, badgers, and lizards.

Reform UK councillor for Bexley, Frank Etheridge, is spearheading the opposition, vehemently opposing what he calls "nonsense" spending of taxpayer funds. He argues the extravagant sum is especially galling as many local residents struggle with soaring living costs.

'A Slap in the Face for Every Taxpayer'

Councillor Etheridge did not mince his words. "It is an absolute disgrace," he stated. "To be spending £4 million of taxpayers' money on a bridge for bats is beyond belief, especially when you see what's happening in this country with the cost-of-living crisis."

He emphasised the glaring misplacement of priorities, questioning the council's decision-making. "People can't afford to pay their mortgages, and we're spending £4 million on a bridge for bats? It is a nonsense."

The Council's Green Justification

The controversial structure is part of the larger £130 million A2 Bexley Village Highway Improvements scheme. Transport for London (TfL) and Bexley Council have defended the project, stating it is a legal and ecological necessity.

Official documents confirm the bridge is a "dedicated wildlife crossing" required to maintain habitat connectivity for protected species displaced by the road-widening works. A council spokesperson highlighted their obligation to "protect and improve the local natural environment," suggesting the crossing would benefit a range of species, not just bats.

A Nationwide Debate on Spending Priorities

This incident in Bexley has ignited a broader national conversation about fiscal responsibility and environmental spending. Critics argue that while conservation is important, such a colossal expense on a single animal crossing is difficult to justify during a period of economic hardship for many families.

The 'bat bridge' stands as a potent symbol for those who believe local government spending has lost touch with the immediate needs of the people it serves, setting the stage for continued debate as construction moves forward.