A fresh debate over the effectiveness of speed cameras is gaining momentum across the UK, centring on a provocative question: should they be concealed from drivers?
The Core of the Controversy
The discussion, highlighted in a reader-led forum, challenges the current system where highly visible cameras are often preceded by warning signs. Critics argue this setup allows motorists to brake momentarily at known locations before resuming excessive speeds on surrounding roads, particularly in 20mph and 30mph zones. This practice, they contend, fundamentally undermines the goal of consistent road safety.
"I'm a driver, but also a pedestrian and cyclist and get fed up with seeing cars zooming down local roads at way more than 20 or 30mph," said Amy, a reader from Cornwall who sparked the exchange. She pointed out that while flashing speed indicator signs show drivers their speed, there is no penalty for exceeding the limit at those points.
A Call for Government Action
The debate has led to calls for the UK government to consider the issue of hidden speed cameras as part of its ongoing consultations on road safety policy. Proponents of covert enforcement believe removing advanced warnings would encourage compliance with speed limits at all times, not just at specific, well-marked spots. This, they argue, would better protect vulnerable road users like cyclists and pedestrians in residential areas.
Opponents, however, often maintain that the primary purpose of cameras is to deter speeding and modify behaviour, not to generate revenue through surprise penalties. They suggest that visible cameras act as a constant reminder of the law.
What Happens Next?
The conversation remains open, with the public invited to submit their answers and further questions. A selection of responses is due to be published, continuing the long-running series. This public feedback could inform wider policy thinking as authorities grapple with improving traffic enforcement outcomes.
Whether the government will formally add the question of hidden speed cameras to its agenda is yet to be seen. However, the growing frustration expressed by residents like Amy indicates that for many, the current approach to managing speed is not creating safer communities.
