Westminster's Labour-led council has ignited a furious row with residents and political opponents after it sanctioned a giant, multi-coloured mural on a public building without obtaining the necessary planning permission.
The sprawling artwork, which covers the side of the Westbourne Park Family Centre, has been branded an 'absolute eyesore' and an 'act of vandalism' by dismayed locals who were given no prior warning or consultation.
Hypocrisy Claims as Council Bypasses Its Own Rules
The move has sparked accusations of staggering hypocrisy, as the very same council enforces strict planning rules on homeowners and businesses. Critics were quick to point out that any resident attempting a similar exterior alteration would face immediate enforcement action.
'It is the height of hypocrisy for the Labour council to do this without permission whilst they would come down like a ton of bricks on any resident who did the same,' one local critic stated.
A Blot on the Landscape or a Community Asset?
Council officials have defended the mural, created by artist Lakwena, stating it was intended to 'brighten up the area' and bring a sense of 'joy and positivity' to the community. They claim it is part of a broader initiative to utilise art in public spaces.
However, this justification has fallen on deaf ears for many. The mural's bold, abstract design – a departure from the area's traditional streetscape – has been criticised for clashing with its surroundings and undermining the local area's character.
Retrospective Planning Application Submitted
In a clear admission that due process was not followed, the council has now been forced to submit a retrospective planning application to legalise the artwork after the fact. This has left them in the embarrassing position of having to plead their own case for a project they already commissioned.
The application will now be subject to public scrutiny and a decision by the council's own planning committee, placing the local authority in the unusual role of both applicant and judge.
The controversial incident raises significant questions about local government accountability and the principle that those who make the rules must also be bound by them.
