Surgeon's Shocking Admission: I Lied About Sepsis to Have My Legs Amputated for £466k Insurance Payout
Surgeon admits lying about sepsis to have legs amputated

In a case that has sent shockwaves through the medical and legal communities, a surgeon has made a staggering courtroom admission: he deliberately lied about having sepsis to convince doctors to amputate both his legs, all part of an elaborate scheme to fraudulently claim £466,000 in insurance payouts.

Dr. David Nguyen, 43, a former orthopaedic surgeon, offered the shocking confession during a hearing at Oxford Crown Court. He pleaded guilty to a single count of fraud by false representation, admitting the entire scheme was a calculated act of deception.

The Calculated Deception

The court heard how Dr. Nguyen's plan began to unravel when medical experts grew suspicious about his reported symptoms. Despite his claims of a severe septic infection threatening his life, subsequent investigations found no clinical evidence that he had ever suffered from sepsis or that the amputations were medically necessary.

His elaborate ruse was solely orchestrated to trigger a lucrative £466,000 payout from an insurance policy he held. The policy specifically covered the loss of limbs due to a traumatic or medical event.

A Career in Ruins

Dr. Nguyen, who was once a respected professional within the NHS, has not only lost his livelihood but now faces the almost certain prospect of a substantial prison sentence. His actions represent a profound breach of trust, not just against the insurance company, but against the entire medical profession and his colleagues.

The case highlights the extreme lengths to which individuals might go to commit insurance fraud, exploiting their own medical knowledge to deceive other professionals.

Justice Served

Judge Michael Gledhill KC has remanded Nguyen in custody ahead of his sentencing hearing scheduled for a later date. The judge warned the defendant to expect a significant custodial sentence for his crimes, which he described as among the most serious of their kind.

This case serves as a stark warning about the severe consequences of attempting to defraud insurance companies and the manipulation of medical trust for personal gain.