A senior finance executive who was absent from work for nearly the entire year due to illness has launched legal action against her employer after receiving a £10,000 bonus – which she claims is insufficient.
The director, who worked just 18 days in the past year, argues that her bonus was unfairly reduced due to her prolonged sick leave. She is now suing for what she believes is a rightful increase.
Details of the Dispute
The case has sparked debate over workplace fairness, with critics questioning whether employees who contribute minimally due to extended absences should still expect full bonuses.
Legal experts suggest the outcome could set a precedent for similar disputes, particularly in high-paying corporate roles where performance-related pay is a significant part of compensation.
Employer’s Stance
The company maintains that bonuses are tied to performance and attendance, arguing that the £10,000 payment was already a goodwill gesture given the circumstances.
However, the claimant insists that her contractual entitlements were not fully honoured, leading to the legal challenge.
Public Reaction
The case has drawn mixed reactions, with some sympathising with the director’s health struggles, while others view the lawsuit as excessive given her limited work contribution.
Employment lawyers warn that such disputes could become more common as companies reassess bonus structures post-pandemic.
