A Perth hairdresser has found herself at the centre of a social media storm after implementing a controversial policy that bans children under 12 from her salon. Sharlene Lee, owner of the styling business, faces mounting criticism from parents who've labelled her stance as "discriminatory" and "unreasonable."
The policy, clearly displayed in Lee's salon, states that children under 12 are not permitted on the premises under any circumstances. The hairdresser defends her position by citing numerous negative experiences with young clients and their parents that have disrupted her business operations.
The Business Owner's Defence
Lee explained that her decision stems from repeated incidents where children have damaged property, created excessive noise, and generally disrupted the calm atmosphere she aims to maintain for her clients. "I've had children running around with scissors, screaming during appointments, and even damaging expensive equipment," she revealed.
The hairdresser emphasised that her policy isn't meant to punish all parents, but rather to protect her business and ensure a quality experience for all clients. "This is my livelihood, and I need to maintain a professional environment where I can focus on my work," Lee stated.
Parental Backlash and Social Media Reaction
The policy has triggered strong reactions across social media platforms, with many parents expressing outrage. One mother commented: "This is pure discrimination against families. What are working parents supposed to do?"
Others have taken to review platforms to express their displeasure, with some calling for boycotts of the establishment. The debate has divided the local community, with strong opinions on both sides of the argument.
Industry Perspectives
While Lee's approach may seem extreme, she's not alone in facing challenges with young clients in beauty establishments. Many salon owners report similar difficulties, though few have taken such a definitive stance.
Some industry professionals have voiced support for Lee's right to set business policies that protect her enterprise, while others suggest compromise solutions like designated children's hours or parenting-friendly scheduling options.
The controversy raises broader questions about business owners' rights versus family accessibility, and whether service industries should accommodate all age groups regardless of potential disruption.
