FDA Eases Rules on 'No Artificial Colors' Food Label Claims
FDA Relaxes 'No Artificial Colors' Label Rules

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has announced a significant relaxation of regulations governing food labeling claims related to artificial colors. This pivotal change allows food companies to assert that their products contain "no artificial colors" even when they incorporate dyes derived from natural sources, such as plants, provided they are free from petroleum-based synthetic dyes.

New Labeling Guidelines Explained

Historically, the FDA restricted such claims to products that had "no added color whatsoever." The updated policy, unveiled on Thursday, February 5, 2026, marks a departure from this stringent stance. It enables manufacturers to highlight the absence of artificial colors while utilizing natural alternatives, thereby aligning with broader efforts to phase out synthetic additives from the American food supply.

Administration Support and Industry Response

In a joint statement, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary emphasized that this regulatory adjustment is designed to incentivize companies to transition from synthetic to natural colorants. "We are removing a significant barrier, making it simpler for businesses to incorporate these safer colors into the everyday foods consumed by families across the nation," Makary remarked.

The initiative has already garnered voluntary compliance from major food producers like PepsiCo and Nestle, who have committed to eliminating synthetic dyes. Additionally, several states have implemented bans on artificial colors in school meals, reflecting a growing public and governmental push towards cleaner ingredients.

Mixed Reactions from Advocacy Groups

Consumer Brands, a prominent trade association representing packaged food companies, praised the FDA's decision. Sarah Gallo, the group's senior vice president, stated, "This move exemplifies the FDA's leadership in ensuring ingredient safety and transparency through a science-driven evaluation process."

Conversely, consumer advocacy organizations have expressed concerns. Sarah Sorscher, director of regulatory affairs at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, warned that the new labeling could potentially mislead consumers. She noted that it might permit "no artificial colors" claims for additives not derived from petroleum, including substances like titanium dioxide, which some studies suggest could pose health risks.

Expansion of Natural Dye Approvals

Concurrently, the FDA has approved beetroot red as a new natural dye and expanded the permissible uses of spirulina extract, an algae-based colorant that imparts a blue hue to foods. The agency currently sanctions approximately three dozen natural dyes for food applications.

Ongoing Regulatory Actions on Synthetic Dyes

This policy shift follows recent FDA actions targeting synthetic dyes. Last year, the agency banned Red No. 3 and has proposed prohibiting Orange B. Furthermore, the FDA has initiated a review of six remaining petroleum-based dyes commonly used in the U.S. food supply: Green No. 3, Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5, Yellow No. 6, Blue No. 1, and Blue No. 2.

Health Implications and Scientific Debate

Health advocates have long campaigned for the removal of artificial dyes, citing research that links them to neurobehavioral issues such as hyperactivity and attention deficits in some children. Experts also highlight that vibrant synthetic colors are often a hallmark of ultraprocessed foods marketed to youth, which can contribute to increased consumption of unhealthy levels of sugar, fat, and sodium.

Despite these concerns, the FDA's official website continues to acknowledge the limited evidence of harm from artificial colors. It states, "The totality of scientific evidence indicates that most children experience no adverse effects from consuming foods with color additives, though some data suggests certain children may exhibit sensitivity."

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP maintains full editorial control over all content.