The Guardian has issued a strong editorial calling on Ofcom, the UK's communications regulator, to intensify its efforts in policing the internet. The piece argues that while the Online Safety Act represents a significant step forward, its implementation has been too slow and hesitant, allowing harmful content to persist on major platforms.
Ofcom's Current Approach Under Scrutiny
The editorial criticises Ofcom for what it perceives as a cautious approach to enforcement. It notes that the regulator has issued guidance and codes of practice but has yet to impose substantial fines or other penalties on tech companies that fail to comply with their new legal duties. The Guardian contends that this reluctance undermines the Act's intended effect and leaves users, particularly children, exposed to dangerous material.
Call for Stronger Enforcement
The article emphasises that the Online Safety Act gives Ofcom significant powers, including the ability to fine companies up to 10% of their global turnover. However, the regulator has been slow to use these powers. The Guardian urges Ofcom to move from guidance to action, arguing that only credible threats of enforcement will compel tech giants to change their behaviour. It points to examples where platforms have been slow to remove illegal content such as terrorism propaganda, child sexual abuse material, and hate speech.
The editorial also highlights concerns about algorithmic amplification of harmful content. It calls on Ofcom to scrutinise how platforms' recommendation systems promote divisive or dangerous material, and to require transparency in how these algorithms operate.
Balancing Free Speech and Safety
The Guardian acknowledges the tension between content regulation and free expression. It argues that the Online Safety Act is designed to target illegal content and activity, not lawful speech. However, it warns that poorly designed enforcement could have a chilling effect on legitimate discourse. The editorial therefore calls for a careful, proportionate approach that prioritises the most serious harms while protecting democratic debate.
The piece concludes that the public expects action, not just words, from Ofcom. It states that the regulator must now demonstrate that it is willing to use its powers decisively to make the internet safer for all users, especially the most vulnerable.
