A cyclist who smashed into a pedestrian, causing catastrophic skull injuries that led to her death, has been fined just £100 in a case that has sparked widespread outrage and calls for legal reform.
A Life Lost, A Minimal Punishment
Charlie Alliston, then 18, was riding an illegal fixed-gear bicycle without front brakes when he collided with 44-year-old Kim Briggs as she crossed Old Street in London in February 2016. The impact was so severe that it shattered Mrs. Briggs' skull and caused irreversible brain damage. She died in hospital a week later.
Alliston was convicted of "wanton or furious driving" under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act – an archaic law never intended for modern cycling offences. The maximum sentence under this legislation is just two years, but Alliston received no jail time.
'An Insult to Justice'
The victim's husband, Matthew Briggs, described the £100 fine as "insulting" and "paltry," stating it completely failed to reflect the gravity of the offence or the value of his wife's life.
"The outcome of this case demonstrates the gaping void in our legal system," Mr. Briggs said. "When a death occurs due to dangerous cycling, there exists no adequate law to address it properly."
Legal Loopholes and Calls for Change
The case has highlighted significant shortcomings in UK legislation regarding cycling offences. Unlike dangerous drivers who can be charged with causing death by dangerous driving, cyclists face no equivalent charge.
Following the tragedy, the Department for Transport has been reviewing cycling offences and considering introducing new laws that would create specific offences of causing death or serious injury while cycling.
This case serves as a tragic reminder of the need for updated legislation that properly addresses all forms of dangerous behaviour on our roads, regardless of the vehicle involved.
