
A major economic summit in the Scottish Highlands has been plunged into controversy after local Members of the Scottish Parliament were deliberately excluded from attending the high-profile event.
The meeting, organised by the UK Government, has been branded a "complete stitch-up" by furious local representatives who were barred from participating in discussions about their own constituency's future.
Democracy Denied in the Highlands
Despite representing the Inverness area at Holyrood, MSPs were notably absent from the crucial talks that could shape the region's economic development. The decision to exclude elected local representatives has sparked outrage among political figures and community leaders alike.
Fergus Ewing, SNP MSP for Inverness and Nairn, didn't mince his words: "It's a complete stitch-up. They've excluded the local MSPs because they don't want any awkward questions or scrutiny of their plans."
Westminster's Controversial Guest List
The summit, which brought together business leaders and UK government officials, has been criticised for its lack of transparency and democratic accountability. Local politicians argue that excluding them from discussions about their own region's future undermines the very principles of devolution.
One source close to the organisation of the event suggested the exclusions were deliberate, stating that organisers specifically wanted to avoid "political debates" and focus instead on "business discussions."
Growing Backlash and Political Fallout
The controversy has ignited a broader debate about Westminster's approach to Scottish affairs and the respect shown to devolved governance structures. Critics argue that bypassing elected local representatives shows contempt for Scotland's democratic institutions.
As news of the exclusions spread, social media erupted with criticism, with many comparing the situation to "seagulls swooping in" - a reference to outsiders making decisions without understanding local needs or consulting proper representatives.
The incident raises serious questions about how economic planning and development should be conducted in devolved nations, and whether Westminster's current approach risks further alienating Scottish communities and their elected officials.