In a move that has sent ripples through Westminster, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer's proposal to enlist Lord Peter Mandelson as a key business ambassador is being subjected to rigorous security vetting by the intelligence services.
The potential appointment of the former Business Secretary, a figure often dubbed the 'Prince of Darkness' for his political shrewdness, is being meticulously examined by MI5 and Whitehall officials. This deep-dive scrutiny is standard protocol for roles that involve representing the UK's commercial interests on the global stage, where access to sensitive information is commonplace.
A History Under Review
The security vetting process is understood to be delving into Lord Mandelson's extensive history in both government and the private sector. His roles as a European Trade Commissioner and his directorship at Russian-state bank Sberbank until early 2022 are likely areas of particular interest for officials tasked with assessing any potential risks or conflicts of interest.
His establishment of a global advisory firm, Global Counsel, further adds layers to the due diligence process, as authorities seek to map his vast network of international contacts and clients.
Starmer's Strategic Gambit
Sir Keir's intention to bring Mandelson into the fold signals a clear strategic direction. It represents an embrace of New Labour-era experience and a desire to project a message of economic competence and strong relations with the business community, should he win the keys to Number 10.
Mandelson's unparalleled experience in trade and diplomacy is seen by Starmer's team as an invaluable asset for rebuilding Britain's commercial bridges post-Brexit and fostering crucial investment.
Whitehall's Cautious Stance
Despite the political intentions, Whitehall mandarins are treating the appointment with characteristic caution. The involvement of the security services underscores the seriousness with which such cross-over roles between government and business are treated, prioritising national security above all else.
The outcome of the vetting process remains to be seen, but it has already ignited a debate about the blending of high-level political influence with international business diplomacy, and the safeguards required to ensure it is done without compromising the nation's interests.
