Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is facing a potential parliamentary sleaze inquiry over allegations that he misled MPs regarding the appointment of Lord Peter Mandelson as US ambassador. Former Foreign Office mandarin Sir Philip Barton has contradicted Sir Keir's assertion that 'full due process' was followed in the appointment process.
Contradiction Over Due Process
Sir Philip Barton revealed that it was unusual for the appointment to be announced before security vetting was completed. He stated that he had concerns about Lord Mandelson's connection to paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, describing it as a 'toxic, hot potato' subject. Sir Keir was made aware of these risks but decided to proceed with the appointment.
McSweeney Admits Mistake
Morgan McSweeney, Sir Keir's former chief of staff, admitted that his recommendation for Lord Mandelson's appointment was a mistake. However, he denied asking officials to ignore procedures or skip checks. Lord Mandelson was granted developed vetting status despite failing initial checks and was later sacked.
Sir Keir has dismissed the inquiry as a 'political stunt' ahead of May's elections. The controversy continues to cast a shadow over the Prime Minister's leadership as the parliamentary sleaze inquiry looms.
