
Since departing the doors of 10 Downing Street, Boris Johnson has orchestrated a remarkable financial transformation, turning his controversial premiership into a multi-million pound enterprise. A deep dive into his post-PM career reveals a staggering accumulation of wealth that raises serious questions about the intersection of public service and private profit.
The Speaking Circuit Gold Rush
Johnson has become one of the world's most sought-after speakers, commanding astronomical fees that would make even seasoned bankers blush. His appearances at corporate events and international conferences have reportedly earned him fees exceeding £100,000 per engagement. This speaking circuit has become the cornerstone of his post-political earnings strategy.
Media Mogul Moves
Beyond the podium, Johnson has secured lucrative media contracts that keep him in the public eye while padding his bank account. His regular columns and media appearances provide a steady income stream while maintaining his political influence. The lines between commentary and commerce have become increasingly blurred.
Advisory Roles and Consultancies
The former Prime Minister has quietly positioned himself as an advisor to various organisations seeking to leverage his political connections and international stature. These advisory roles, often shrouded in confidentiality agreements, provide another significant revenue stream while raising questions about potential conflicts of interest.
The Ethical Dilemma
Johnson's financial activities spotlight the ongoing debate about how former prime ministers should capitalise on their experience and connections. The absence of robust regulatory frameworks has created a grey area where public service and private enrichment increasingly overlap.
Public Reaction and Political Fallout
The revelation of Johnson's financial success has sparked mixed reactions, with critics accusing him of monetising his privileged access while supporters argue he's simply capitalising on his experience. The ongoing scrutiny reflects broader concerns about transparency and accountability in British political life.