David Lammy Faces Backlash: Accused of 'Sidelining' Women's Rights in Controversial Human Rights Council Snub
Lammy accused of ignoring women's rights in UN delegation row

Shadow Foreign Secretary David Lammy finds himself at the centre of a political storm, accused of overlooking women's rights organisations in a controversial decision for a high-profile United Nations posting.

A Contentious Appointment

The row erupted after it was revealed that Lammy's office selected the LGBTQ charity, Rainbow Railroad, to represent the UK on its delegation to the 57th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. This move has drawn sharp criticism from groups like Sex Matters and Labour Women's Declaration, who argue it creates a damaging 'hierarchy of rights'.

'A Slap in the Face' for Women's Advocacy

Maya Forstater, executive director of Sex Matters, expressed profound disappointment, stating the decision signals that "women's rights are an afterthought" for the Labour frontbench. She highlighted the irony of the Shadow Foreign Secretary seemingly ignoring the very issues his party claims to champion.

Critics point out that this appointment comes at a critical time when protections for single-sex spaces and the legal definition of 'sex' are fiercely debated topics.

Labour's Internal Divisions Exposed

The controversy has also shone a light on deep divisions within the Labour Party itself. A spokesperson for Labour Women's Declaration called the move "deeply insulting", accusing the leadership of failing to listen to its own female members and constituents who are concerned about the erosion of sex-based rights.

Defending the Decision

While Lammy's team has yet to issue a formal public statement, sources suggest the selection of Rainbow Railroad was intended to highlight global LGBTQ+ persecution. However, this defence has done little to quell the anger from those who feel a balanced delegation should include dedicated representation for women's rights.

A Wider Political Problem

This incident is seen by many as symptomatic of a broader issue within modern political discourse, where competing rights claims are often pitted against one another. The fallout raises serious questions about how a potential future Labour government would navigate these complex and sensitive issues on the international stage.