King's Counsel Condemns 'Astonishing Act of Self-Harm' as UK Government Axes Criminal Barristers from Legal Aid Advisory Roles | Daily Mail
KC: Legal Aid Reform 'Astonishing Act of Self-Harm'

In a blistering critique that has sent shockwaves through the legal establishment, renowned King's Counsel Thomas Ross has branded the government's decision to remove specialist criminal barristers from the Legal Aid Agency's advisory panel as an 'astonishing act of self-harm' that will severely compromise the fairness of trials in England and Wales.

The controversial move by the Ministry of Justice means that the committee responsible for shaping legal aid policy will no longer include any practising barristers specialising in criminal law—the very experts who understand the practical realities of the justice system.

A Crisis in the Making

Mr Ross, a highly respected criminal defence barrister with decades of experience, did not mince his words in his condemnation. He warned that this decision comes at the worst possible time, when the criminal justice system is already teetering on the brink of collapse due to chronic underfunding, massive court backlogs, and a growing exodus of legal professionals from publicly funded work.

'The removal of criminal barristers from the panel is not just misguided; it's potentially catastrophic for the principle of fair trials,' Ross stated. 'These are the practitioners who bring frontline experience and understand the practical impact of legal aid decisions on the ground.'

The Voice of Experience Silenced

The advisory panel plays a crucial role in reviewing legal aid applications for complex and high-cost cases, ensuring that public funds are allocated appropriately while guaranteeing defendants' right to proper representation. The inclusion of practising criminal barristers has traditionally provided essential, real-world insights into this process.

With their removal, Ross fears the system will become dominated by civil servants and legal managers who lack recent courtroom experience, potentially leading to decisions that look good on spreadsheets but fail in practice.

Broader Implications for Justice

This development represents the latest chapter in the ongoing crisis facing the UK's legal aid system. Years of funding cuts have already created 'legal deserts' across the country where finding representation for criminal cases has become increasingly difficult.

Many fear that without the expert guidance of practising barristers, the Legal Aid Agency may make decisions that further exacerbate these problems, potentially violating the fundamental right to a fair trial and increasing the risk of miscarriages of justice.

The Ministry of Justice has yet to provide a detailed justification for the exclusion of criminal barristers from the panel, leaving many in the legal profession concerned that this move prioritises cost-cutting over quality and fairness.

As Thomas Ross KC starkly put it: 'This isn't just rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic—it's throwing the navigation experts overboard while heading straight for the iceberg.'