In a dramatic escalation of their transatlantic legal feud, French First Lady Brigitte Macron has launched a blistering attack against American conservative commentator Candace Owens, accusing her of attempting to monetise false claims that Mrs Macron was born male.
Legal Documents Reveal Explosive Allegations
Newly filed legal papers in the United States reveal Mrs Macron's legal team has presented compelling evidence suggesting Owens is deliberately propagating the baseless theory for financial gain. The documents claim the controversial media personality is seeking to "cash in" on what French officials describe as a "completely fabricated" narrative about the First Lady's identity.
The Transatlantic Libel Battle Intensifies
The legal confrontation began when Owens repeatedly promoted conspiracy theories alleging the 71-year-old former teacher was assigned male at birth. Mrs Macron's representatives have characterised these claims as not only false but deliberately malicious, designed to generate controversy and revenue through increased online engagement.
"This isn't about political disagreement—it's about the deliberate spread of verifiably false information for profit," stated a source close to the French First Lady's legal team. "The evidence clearly shows a pattern of monetisation around these fabricated claims."
Financial Motives Under Scrutiny
Legal experts analysing the case suggest the financial angle could significantly strengthen Mrs Macron's libel claim. By demonstrating Owens stands to benefit financially from spreading the allegations, the First Lady's team may overcome traditional free speech protections in American law.
The court documents reportedly detail how the false narrative has been leveraged across multiple revenue streams, including:
- Increased social media following and engagement
- Enhanced speaking fees and media appearances
- Merchandise sales tied to controversial content
- Subscription revenue from platforms hosting the claims
Implications for International Defamation Law
This high-profile case represents a fascinating test of how European public figures can pursue defamation claims against American commentators. The outcome could set important precedents for similar cross-border legal actions in the digital age.
Mrs Macron's legal team has assembled what they describe as "overwhelming evidence" disproving the gender claims, including historical documents, photographic evidence, and testimony from lifelong acquaintances.
The case continues to attract significant international attention, highlighting growing tensions between free speech protections and the fight against misinformation in global media.
