ABC Under Fire: Top Journalists Accused of Biased Immigration Reporting | Exclusive
ABC journalists revolt over 'biased' 7.30 immigration report

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) is facing a significant internal crisis following a formal complaint from its own senior journalists. The complaint targets the flagship current affairs programme '7.30', accusing it of activist journalism and a failure to uphold impartiality standards in a report on immigration.

The controversial segment, presented by Isabella Higgins, featured an interview with Indigenous Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price. According to the internal letter, seen by Daily Mail Australia, the report was heavily criticised for its 'clear bias' and for misrepresenting Senator Price's views on the country's population growth and immigration policies.

Allegations of 'Activist Journalism' and Editorial Failure

The complaint, signed by multiple experienced ABC staff members, alleges a serious breach of the national broadcaster's editorial policies. The journalists claim the '7.30' piece was intentionally crafted to portray Senator Price's stance in a negative light, rather than to inform the public.

Key grievances outlined in the letter include:

  • The use of a 'sinister' tone and music, creating a misleading atmosphere around the interview.
  • A failure to provide crucial context regarding Australia's net overseas migration numbers.
  • An overall approach that aligned more with activism than balanced, factual reporting.

The staff members expressed profound concern that such content undermines public trust in the ABC and represents a departure from its charter obligations.

ABC Management's Response and Wider Implications

In response to the allegations, an ABC spokeswoman stated that the broadcaster stands by the professionalism of its '7.30' team and its leadership. She emphasised that the ABC has comprehensive processes for handling audience and staff feedback.

This incident has ignited a fierce debate within the corporation's Ultimo headquarters, highlighting a deep ideological divide. It raises serious questions about the direction of the ABC's current affairs coverage and its adherence to mandated standards of fairness and accuracy.

The fallout from this internal revolt is being closely watched, as it strikes at the heart of the national broadcaster's reputation for impartiality during a highly sensitive national debate on immigration.