Explosive new allegations have emerged from a forthcoming book, claiming that former US President Donald Trump aggressively advocated for a military assault on Venezuela during a pivotal 2020 meeting in the Oval Office.
The revelation, detailed in an upcoming publication, suggests Trump was prepared to authorise a significant and violent strike against the South American nation, a plan that was ultimately blocked by alarmed senior advisors.
'Just do it'
According to the account, Trump's directive to his national security team was stark and unambiguous. He is reported to have demanded a military operation, insisting his aides 'get it done' and to simply 'do it'. This push for immediate action reportedly left officials deeply concerned about the potential for a drastic escalation and a new, unauthorized war.
The White House Pushback
The book claims that key figures, including then-national security adviser Robert O'Brien and other top officials, mounted a vigorous opposition to the President's sudden directive. Their successful intervention is presented as having prevented a potentially catastrophic military engagement that could have had severe diplomatic and humanitarian consequences.
This alleged incident paints a picture of a volatile decision-making process at the highest level of the US government, with advisors acting as a crucial check on presidential power. It raises significant questions about the protocols and stability within the Trump administration's national security apparatus.
The Venezuelan government, led by Nicolás Maduro, has long been a target of criticism and sanctions from the United States, which has recognised opposition leader Juan Guaidó as the country's legitimate leader. However, a direct military strike would have marked an unprecedented and drastic shift in policy.
As these claims enter the public domain, they are sure to fuel further debate about the nature of Trump's presidency and his approach to international conflict and diplomacy.
