Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the controversial independent presidential candidate, has sparked bewilderment after suggesting that Canada should use ostriches to tackle bird flu outbreaks.
During a recent speech, Kennedy claimed that ostriches—unlike chickens—are immune to avian influenza and could serve as an alternative protein source. His remarks were met with scepticism from scientists and agricultural experts.
What Did RFK Jr. Actually Say?
Kennedy, a prominent anti-vaccine activist, argued that Canada’s poultry industry could avoid mass culls by switching to ostrich farming. He insisted that these large birds are naturally resistant to bird flu, though he provided no credible evidence to support his claim.
"Ostriches don’t get avian flu," Kennedy declared. "If Canada raised ostriches instead of chickens, they wouldn’t have to kill millions of birds every time there’s an outbreak."
Experts Dismiss the Idea
Veterinary scientists quickly debunked Kennedy’s assertion. Dr. Emily Carter, an avian disease specialist, told reporters that ostriches can contract bird flu, just like other poultry. "This is misinformation," she said. "Ostriches are not a magical solution."
Canadian poultry farmers also rejected the proposal, pointing out that ostriches require vastly different farming conditions and are not a viable replacement for chickens in mass production.
Why This Matters
Kennedy’s comments come amid growing concerns about misinformation surrounding public health and agriculture. His unverified claims about ostriches add to a long history of controversial statements on vaccines, medicine, and now, poultry science.
While some of his supporters praised the idea as "outside-the-box thinking," experts warn that such baseless suggestions could undermine real efforts to combat avian influenza.
