The leading Dutch dictionary, Dikke van Dale, has officially agreed to add the term 'vulvalippen' ('labia') to its upcoming online edition, replacing the Dutch word 'schaamlippen', which literally translates to 'shame lips'.
For around 300 years, women in The Netherlands have used the term 'schaamlippen' to describe a normal part of their anatomy, in biology lessons at school and at medical appointments. Campaigners from the Schaamteloos (Shameless) movement have been lobbying to replace the word with the more neutral 'vulvalippen'.
Campaign success
Speaking to Metro, Shari Klein, co-founder of Schaamteloos, said: 'I advocated for this word change because we shouldn't be ashamed of any part of our body.'
'Our Dutch language needs a very much needed update and we made that change by campaigning and simply using the word more.'
'I hope this language change helps shape a shame free society and more countries and languages will follow in our steps.'
Why language matters
Pharmacist and healthcare lawyer Thorrun Govind told Metro that the way we speak about women's bodies 'really matters'. She said: 'We can be surprisingly uncomfortable talking about periods, menopause, breasts, vulvas and other parts of female anatomy. That can feed into shame or embarrassment.'
'Using the right words and being able to talk about women's health openly, is part of changing that.' She added that talking about women's anatomy clearly supports 'health literacy' — being able to access and understand health services, and make informed decisions to get the right care you need.
Dr Alka Patel also agreed, telling Metro: 'Repeatedly attaching a word meaning 'shame' to a normal part of female anatomy has the potential to reinforce an emotional association with shame or embarrassment.'
'In healthcare, that is very relevant because embarrassment can affect whether a woman talks about her body, examines it, or seeks help when something changes.'
'Changing language doesn't change anatomy, but it can change the emotional meaning attached to it and the behaviour that follows.'
Wider changes across Europe
The campaign in The Netherlands is part of a growing movement across Europe to improve terminology surrounding female health. In 2018, journalists in Germany, Gunda Windmüller and Mithu Sanyal, started a petition to change 'Schamlippen' to 'Vulvalippen.' While the word has yet to be adopted by the German dictionary, it has been used in conversations, school textbooks, and women's magazines. Gunda has expressed her hope that the Dutch change will inspire German reform too.
In 2009, a new word for 'hymen' was added to the academic dictionary in Sweden. Previously, the word mödomshinna had been used, which literally translates to 'virginity membrane' or 'maidenhood skin'. The new term, 'slidkrans', means simply 'vaginal corona'.
Britain has seen similar campaigns too. Podcaster Nicola Denson-Elliott started a petition to replace the 'misogynistic' word 'hysterectomy' (surgical removal of the womb) with 'uterectomy' in June 2026. It currently stands at 1,180 signatures, but needs 10,000 to get a government response. She said that hysterectomy is linked to the diagnosis of hysteria, which was banned in 1980.
Other terms, such as referring to a vaginal birth as a 'normal' or 'natural' birth, compared to other births such as C-sections, have similarly been criticised for valuing vaginal births over others. Terms such as 'incompetent cervix', a cervix that dilates prematurely during pregnancy, and 'hostile womb', a womb which struggles to host sperm and implant an embryo, have also faced criticism.
