Residents of the picturesque New Forest village of Brockenhurst are mounting a fierce campaign against what they call a 'needless act of vandalism' – council plans to demolish their beloved century-old footbridge.
The historic wooden bridge, a familiar and cherished landmark for generations, is slated for destruction by New Forest District Council. The authority claims the structure, which spans the Lymington River, has reached the end of its viable life and requires replacement on safety grounds.
A Community United in Opposition
The council's justification has been met with scepticism and outright anger from locals. Villagers argue that the 100-year-old bridge is not only structurally sound but is an integral part of the area's character and heritage.
One frustrated resident, retired engineer John Fox, 72, stated: 'It's sheer madness. This bridge has stood for a century and with some proper maintenance, it could easily stand for another hundred years. They're using safety as an excuse to push through a cheap, modern solution that has no place in our beautiful forest.'
Clash Over Conservation and Cost
Opponents of the demolition plan have highlighted several key concerns:
- Loss of Heritage: The bridge is a non-designated heritage asset, a piece of living history that contributes to the unique charm of the New Forest.
- Environmental Impact: The construction process for a new bridge would cause significant disruption to the sensitive riverbank ecosystem.
- Financial Question Marks: Many residents question the economic sense of the project, believing refurbishment would be far cheaper than a full rebuild.
- Modern Design: Fears that a replacement will be a generic, pre-fabricated structure lacking the character of the original.
Council Digs In Heels
Despite the growing backlash, New Forest District Council appears steadfast in its decision. A council spokesman defended the plan, saying: 'The existing bridge is deteriorating and no longer meets modern health and safety standards. Our priority must be the safety of residents and visitors. The new design will be fully accessible and provide a safe crossing for generations to come.'
This official line has done little to placate the community. A petition to save the bridge is rapidly gaining signatures, and local councillors are being pressured to intervene.
The dispute encapsulates a classic battle between modernisation and preservation, leaving the fate of this leafy Hampshire landmark hanging in the balance.
