Ben Cohen, the iconic co-founder of the socially conscious ice cream giant Ben & Jerry's, has declared he is stepping back from political activism, delivering a sobering verdict on the state of public discourse.
In a candid and reflective interview, Cohen expressed a profound sense of frustration, describing the current political environment as "impossible" for creating genuine change. The billionaire philanthropist stated that the intense polarisation, particularly in the wake of Brexit, has made meaningful conversation across ideological lines nearly extinct.
The 'Impossible' Climate for Change
Cohen revealed that his decision stems from the exhausting reality of modern activism. He lamented that the goal of changing anyone's mind on major issues has become a futile endeavour. The public sphere, he argues, is now dominated by entrenched positions and echo chambers, where listening has been replaced by shouting.
"You can’t have a conversation with anybody who doesn’t already agree with you," Cohen observed, highlighting the deep divisions that have come to define political and social debates.
A Legacy of Corporate Activism
This retreat marks a significant moment, given Cohen's history of blending business with social justice. Under his guidance, Ben & Jerry's became synonymous with progressive corporate activism, championing causes from climate change to racial equality long before it was commonplace.
His departure from the front lines signals a worrying trend for many who saw corporate leadership as a powerful vehicle for advocacy. Cohen's blunt assessment suggests that even the most seasoned and well-resourced activists are finding the current climate untenable.
What This Means for Social Advocacy
Cohen's exit raises critical questions about the future of activism and philanthropy. If a figure with his platform and resources feels his efforts are ineffective, what does that mean for the broader movement?
His comments point to a deeper societal sickness—one where compromise and dialogue have been casualties of a relentless culture war. It serves as a stark warning about the health of democracy itself when common ground can no longer be found.
