Bridgerton's Band-Aid Blunder: Modern Detail Sparks Historical Accuracy Debate
Eagle-eyed fans of Netflix's hit period drama Bridgerton have been left both amused and perplexed after spotting a glaring anachronism in the show's latest season. The detail in question is a small, flesh-coloured Band-Aid visible on the ear of Lady Araminta, portrayed by actress Katie Leung, in several scenes.
Viewers Divided Over Editing Oversight
The discovery has ignited a lively discussion on social media and fan forums, with many viewers pointing out the historical inaccuracy. The adhesive bandage, a modern invention, was not created until 1920, while Bridgerton is set in the early 19th century during the Regency era. This has led to speculation that the Band-Aid was used to conceal a cartilage piercing on the actress, a practice that would be out of place in the show's time period.
While some fans have expressed confusion and criticism over what they see as a careless editing mistake, others have rushed to the show's defence. They argue that Bridgerton has never claimed to be a strictly historically accurate portrayal, often blending period aesthetics with modern sensibilities in its storytelling and music. For these viewers, such minor details are inconsequential to the overall enjoyment of the series.
Not the First Anachronism for Netflix
This incident is not an isolated case for the streaming giant. Netflix previously faced similar scrutiny when an anachronistic Under Armour logo was spotted in a scene from its popular series Stranger Things. Following viewer complaints, the company took action to remove the modern branding from the show, demonstrating a responsiveness to fan feedback on historical authenticity.
The debate highlights a broader tension in period dramas between creative liberty and factual precision. As shows like Bridgerton continue to captivate global audiences, such moments serve as a reminder of the careful balance required in production to maintain immersion while allowing for artistic expression.
