A controversial board game that allows players to take on roles such as the Irish Republican Army (IRA) and British Forces has been strongly criticised by a survivors' organisation for trivialising the profound suffering endured during the Northern Ireland conflict.
Gameplay Sparks Outrage Among Victims' Advocates
The game, titled 'The Troubles: Shadow War in Northern Ireland', features gameplay mechanics where participants can assume the identities of various factions involved in the historical strife, including 'the British Forces', 'the IRA', and 'Loyalist Paramilitaries'. It incorporates cards that reference sensitive and traumatic events from the period, such as 'Bombing' and 'Internment', which have drawn particular concern from those affected by the violence.
Survivors' Group Voices Strong Objections
Kenny Donaldson, the director of the South East Fermanagh Foundation, a group representing survivors and victims, has expressed deep reservations about the game's impact. He highlighted that the content could potentially trigger distressing memories for survivors and minimises their harrowing experiences. Mr Donaldson emphasised the need for a trauma-informed approach when dealing with such sensitive historical events, which he believes the game lacks.
In his criticism, Mr Donaldson drew a poignant parallel to how families of 9/11 victims might react to a similar game about that terror attack, underscoring the importance of respecting the pain and legacy of those who suffered. He disputed claims that the game serves an educational purpose, arguing that it fails to adequately convey the gravity and human cost of the conflict.
Developer's Response and Educational Intent
Compass Games, the US-based developer behind the board game, has responded to the backlash by stating that their intention is to create an educational tool. They aim to inform people outside the United Kingdom about the complexities of the Northern Ireland conflict, often referred to as The Troubles. The company clarified that the current version is still in development and not a final product, suggesting that adjustments may be made based on feedback.
Despite this explanation, the survivors' group remains unconvinced, maintaining that the game's approach risks sensationalising and oversimplifying a deeply traumatic period in history. The debate highlights ongoing tensions between historical education and the need for sensitivity towards victims' experiences in media representations.
As discussions continue, the controversy serves as a reminder of the delicate balance required when addressing contentious historical events through interactive formats like board games, where entertainment and education must be carefully weighed against ethical considerations.
