Nevada's Governor, Joe Lombardo, has enacted a comprehensive new crime package into law, a move his office confirmed this week. The legislation, signed over the weekend, aims to enhance public safety across the state with a particular focus on its vital tourism sector.
Key Provisions of the Safe Streets and Neighborhoods Act
The centrepiece of the new law, known as the Safe Streets and Neighborhoods Act, is the planned revival of the Resort Corridor Court. This unique judicial programme, which was disbanded after a year and a half of operation, allows for the banning of individuals convicted of certain offences from the Las Vegas Strip for up to a year. The targeted crimes include petty theft, assault, drug offences, and loitering.
Furthermore, the legislation introduces stiffer penalties for a range of other crimes. These include smash-and-grab robberies, DUIs, and assault and battery committed against hospitality workers. The bill's passage represents a significant political victory for Governor Lombardo, a Republican, as he gears up for what is expected to be a fiercely contested re-election campaign in 2026.
Tourism Safety and Legal Controversy
The push to reopen the Resort Corridor Court was championed by a powerful alliance of resort lobbyists and the union representing hospitality workers. They argue it is essential for improving safety and protecting the visitor-friendly reputation of Las Vegas, which reported an 11% decline in visitors between June 2024 and June 2025.
However, the court faces significant opposition and potential legal hurdles. Critics, including the ACLU of Nevada, question its legality and contend that it unfairly targets homeless individuals. Athar Haseebullah, executive director of the ACLU of Nevada, warned of impending litigation and criticised the "continued creep of privatisation of our judicial system."
While the law authorises the Clark County Commission to revive the court, its immediate future is uncertain. A county spokesperson stated it is premature for the commission to act, as the discretion lies with the Justice Court.
Immigration Enforcement Amendment and Broader Impact
In a notable addition, the final bill also included amendments concerning immigration enforcement. It now prohibits immigration enforcement officers from entering school grounds without a warrant and requires detention facilities to maintain a running list of individuals in custody.
This move aligns Nevada with states like California and Maryland in restricting federal immigration access to schools. The amendment includes exceptions for school resource officers and emergencies, such as a school shooting. Democratic Assemblymember Cecelia González, who sponsored the original standalone immigration bill, ultimately voted against the governor's broader crime package, expressing concern it would do more harm than good.
This legislative action underscores the state's dual focus on bolstering tourism security through stricter local enforcement while simultaneously setting boundaries on federal immigration activities in sensitive locations like schools.
