In a chilling case that sounds like it's from a Black Mirror episode, a man has been granted a protective order against his former partner after she used a drone to spy on him in a campaign of sustained harassment.
The victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, endured months of torment as the unmanned aerial vehicle hovered outside his home and workplace. The intrusive device, piloted by his ex, was used to capture footage and monitor his movements, creating an atmosphere of constant surveillance and fear.
This landmark legal ruling is believed to be the first of its kind in the United Kingdom, setting a crucial precedent for how the justice system handles the misuse of modern technology for stalking and abuse.
A Sinister New Form of Harassment
The court heard how the woman's actions went far beyond typical post-breakup behaviour. The drone became a tool of intimidation, its buzzing presence a relentless reminder that he was being watched. This case highlights a terrifying new frontier in domestic abuse and coercive control, where off-the-shelf technology can be weaponised to invade privacy and inflict psychological terror.
The Legal Breakthrough
Thames Valley Police successfully applied for a Stalking Protection Order (SPO) against the perpetrator. The order, which lasts for two years, imposes strict conditions prohibiting her from:
- Operating any drone within a specified distance of the victim
- Piloting any drone over his property or place of work
- Using any device to capture footage or monitor his activities
This legal intervention was critical in grounding the harasser and providing the victim with much-needed respite and a sense of security.
Expert Reaction and Warnings
Legal experts and advocacy groups have hailed the ruling as a vital step forward. It sends a clear message that the courts will adapt to address 21st-century crimes. The case serves as a stark warning that using drones, dashcams, or other devices to stalk someone is a serious criminal offence with severe consequences.
For victims experiencing similar hi-tech harassment, this case establishes a powerful legal weapon to fight back and reclaim their privacy and peace of mind.
