Louisiana Wins Angola Prison Farm Line Working Conditions Lawsuit
Louisiana Wins Angola Prison Farm Line Lawsuit

A federal judge has determined that he cannot compel Louisiana to address the dangerously harsh conditions faced by prisoners working the "farm line" at the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola. Despite acknowledging that inmates labor outdoors in extreme heat, U.S. District Judge Brian Jackson in Baton Rouge issued a 60-page opinion on Tuesday stating that his hands were tied by a recent appeals court decision.

Legal Constraints and the Parker v. Hooper Case

Judge Jackson explained that his ruling would have differed just months ago, but the conservative 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans changed the legal landscape with its March decision in Parker v. Hooper. In that case, prisoners alleged unconstitutionally poor medical care at Angola, and the appellate court ruled in favor of the state. Jackson noted that this decision weakened the standard for proving cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. Now, if the state can show it took any action—no matter how ineffective—toward remedying a potential violation, it is cleared of liability.

"Before Parker, the Court would have found Defendants liable under the Eighth Amendment for acting with deliberate indifference to the health and safety of incarcerated persons working the farm line," Jackson wrote. "Under the Parker ruling, however, the Court is constrained to find that Defendants' implementation of remedial measures negates a finding of subjective deliberate indifference, even though these remedial measures are inadequate to cure the constitutional violation."

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

The Lawsuit and Advocacy Efforts

The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by four Angola inmates and the New Orleans-based advocacy group Voice of the Experienced (VOTE), sought to halt farm line work at the prison. The number of plaintiffs has since grown. The Promise of Justice Initiative (PJI) and Rights Behind Bars represented the plaintiffs, arguing that farm line labor—especially in excessive heat—violated Eighth Amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishment and breached the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act.

In a press conference on Wednesday, PJI Executive Director Samantha Kennedy described the ruling as "a victory without a remedy." She expressed vindication that the court agreed the conditions were unconstitutional but lamented the lack of consequences for Angola and the Department of Corrections. Senior Attorney Samantha Pourciau noted that litigation had achieved some improvements, such as more frequent breaks, access to water and shade, and expanded protections for those with heat-sensitive medical conditions. However, she warned that without permanent relief, these gains could be reversed. "Incremental change, when it is the difference between heat stroke and survival, is real. We do not diminish it, but permanent protection has not been won. This ruling means that every hard-fought improvement can be reversed tomorrow," Pourciau said.

State Response and Background

The Louisiana Department of Corrections welcomed the ruling, stating that inmate safety remains its top priority. Press Secretary Falon Brown highlighted the department's heat pathology policies, which include risk-mitigation measures like rest breaks and access to shade, fans, and water. Farm line workers at Angola earn minimal pay—after three years without compensation, they receive 2 to 4 cents per hour. The work is often used as punishment and has been described as dehumanizing and reminiscent of slavery.

The Parker v. Hooper case, which influenced this ruling, involved allegations that inadequate medical care at Angola caused serious harm, including permanent disability and death. In November 2023, U.S. District Judge Shelly Dick found that the medical treatment constituted "abhorrent cruel and unusual punishment" and ordered federal oversight. However, the 5th Circuit overturned that remedy in March, ruling that the state's reforms negated a finding of deliberate indifference. That same reasoning applied to the farm line case, where the Department of Corrections had made changes such as revising heat policies, adding weather monitoring systems, and erecting shade pavilions.

This story was originally published by Verite News and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration