Plans to increase flight capacity at Gatwick Airport could have a severe financial impact on local homeowners, with property experts warning of potential house price depreciation for thousands of residences.
Emergency Runway Set for Regular Use
Gatwick Airport has submitted a development proposal to West Sussex County Council seeking permission to routinely use its existing standby runway, located just 12 metres from the main runway. This strategic move would effectively create a dual-runway system, allowing the airport to handle a significant increase in air traffic.
Property Market Braces for Impact
Analysis conducted by property data specialists reveals a troubling outlook for homeowners in surrounding areas. The increased aircraft noise and traffic associated with the expanded operations are expected to make properties less desirable to potential buyers.
Key concerns identified by experts include:
- Increased noise pollution affecting quality of life
- Higher air traffic volumes creating constant disturbance
- Potential planning restrictions for future home extensions
- Negative perception among buyers seeking peaceful locations
Areas Most at Risk
The property analysis highlights specific postcode sectors that would fall directly under the new flight paths, with homes in these areas facing the greatest risk of value reduction. Local estate agents have already reported buyer apprehension when discussing properties in potential impact zones.
Airport's Economic Growth Argument
Gatwick Airport maintains that the runway expansion is crucial for meeting growing passenger demand and boosting regional economic growth. Airport officials emphasize that the project will create jobs and improve connectivity without the need for constructing new infrastructure.
However, local residents and community groups have expressed strong opposition, citing concerns about environmental impact and the potential erosion of property values that represent many homeowners' primary financial investment.
The final decision rests with local planning authorities, who must balance economic development against community welfare and property market stability.
