CBA Chief Defends Withholding £270m from Vulnerable Customers
CBA Boss Grilled Over £270m Fee Decision

CBA Chief Executive Faces Intense Scrutiny Over Fee Controversy

The chief executive of Commonwealth Bank (CBA), Matt Comyn, has launched a vigorous defence of the institution's controversial decision to withhold $270 million in fee repayments from approximately 2.2 million low-income customers. This stance comes despite a recent report from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) that criticised the bank's practices.

Goodwill Payments and Regulatory Findings

This is not the first time CBA has addressed fee-related issues with its more vulnerable clients. Earlier this year, following a 2024 report from the regulator which found that banks were maintaining vulnerable customers in high-fee accounts, CBA distributed $25 million in 'goodwill payments'. These payments were made to tens of thousands of low-income Indigenous customers.

However, the bank's response to the more recent ASIC investigation has been markedly different. The July report accused CBA of charging hundreds of millions of dollars in excessive fees to millions of customers who were actually eligible for low-fee accounts.

Comyn's Hardline Defence and Shareholder Concerns

Appearing before a committee, Matt Comyn firmly doubled down on the bank's position. He asserted that there was 'nothing improper' about the fees charged. Comyn argued that all charges were applied in strict accordance with the bank's published terms and conditions.

In a statement that has drawn significant attention, the bank boss emphasised CBA's status as a commercial entity. He suggested that, viewed from an extreme perspective, returning such a substantial sum to customers could be interpreted by the bank's shareholders as 'an appropriation of our property'. This highlights the tension between corporate profitability and consumer protection, a theme that has persisted since the Australian Banking Royal Commission.

The decision leaves millions of low-income account holders without reimbursement for fees that the regulator deemed excessive, setting a firm precedent for how the bank intends to handle such criticisms in the future.