
A viral TikTok video posted by an American tourist has triggered an extraordinary response from Chilean authorities, leading to a ban on filming with Instagram and TikTok in the centre of Santiago.
The visitor claimed Chile's capital was 'more dangerous than Chicago' in the now-controversial clip, which rapidly accumulated millions of views and sparked intense online debate about safety perceptions in South American cities.
Official Response and New Regulations
In response to the damaging claims, Santiago's authorities have implemented immediate restrictions on social media filming in public spaces. Officials stated the ban aims to prevent the 'dissemination of unverified information' that could harm the city's international reputation.
The city's governor, Claudio Orrego, took to social media platform X to directly address the controversy, stating: 'We cannot allow someone to come and film the city in a way that damages its image with information that is not true.'
Crime Statistics Tell a Different Story
Despite the tourist's alarming claims, official data presents a contrasting reality. Chicago's homicide rate stands at approximately 25 per 100,000 people, while Santiago's equivalent figure is just 3.5 per 100,000 residents.
Security expert Lucía Dammert from the University of Santiago noted: 'There is a significant discrepancy between perception and statistical reality. Santiago remains one of Latin America's safest urban centres, though like any major city, it requires sensible precautions.'
Broader Implications for Social Media and Tourism
This incident raises important questions about the power of social media content to shape travel perceptions and impact local economies. Tourism represents a vital sector for Chile, contributing significantly to its national economy.
The rapid implementation of filming restrictions demonstrates how seriously authorities are treating what they perceive as 'digital misinformation' that could deter visitors.
As travel content continues to flourish on platforms like TikTok and Instagram, this event sets a precedent for how destinations might respond to negative coverage that they consider misleading or damaging.