Ex-Referee Defends VAR Decision in Man City vs Liverpool Controversy
Ex-Referee Defends VAR Decision in Man City vs Liverpool

Former Referee Backs VAR Intervention in Manchester City vs Liverpool Clash

Former Premier League referee Mark Halsey has insisted that official Craig Pawson "had no choice" but to disallow what would have been Manchester City's third goal during the dramatic finale of their 2-1 victory over Liverpool on Sunday, despite significant backlash from fans and pundits.

The Controversial Incident Unpacked

The incident occurred in stoppage time with Manchester City leading 2-1 after goals from Bernardo Silva and Erling Haaland. As City broke forward, a long-range effort from Rayan Cherki trickled toward an unguarded net. Liverpool midfielder Dominik Szoboszlai pulled back Haaland to prevent him from reaching the ball, prompting the Norwegian striker to retaliate before both players lost their footing just as the ball crossed the line.

Initially, referee Craig Pawson allowed the goal to stand after playing advantage for Szoboszlai's foul on Haaland. However, VAR official John Brooks intervened, recommending a review that ultimately led to the goal being overturned and a red card being issued to Szoboszlai for denying a clear goal-scoring opportunity.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Halsey's Detailed Explanation

In his column for The Sun, Halsey provided a thorough breakdown of why Pawson's eventual decision was correct according to the laws of the game. "Credit to Craig, he was waiting to see what happened when Rayan Cherki sent the ball toward an unguarded net," Halsey wrote. "Szoboszlai pulls Haaland back but Craig waits to see if Haaland can still get to the ball. That doesn't happen, so when Haaland then pulls Szoboszlai back, that is stopping the Liverpool player from preventing the ball from going into the net."

Halsey emphasized that no advantage had been signaled by Pawson, meaning that once VAR called him over to review the incident, he was obligated to examine the first offence—the denial of a goal-scoring opportunity by Szoboszlai. "Craig was correct in law," Halsey stated. "People will be saying, 'Why didn't he just give the goal?'. But Haaland's pull-back stopped the Liverpool player from clearing the ball."

Mixed Reactions from the Football World

While Halsey commended Pawson for adhering to the rules, the decision sparked widespread criticism. Gary Neville, commentating for Sky Sports, described the VAR call as "a killjoy" that had "just killed one of the great moments of the season."

Erling Haaland himself expressed sympathy for Szoboszlai, who now faces a three-match suspension, but acknowledged the referee's duty to enforce the regulations. "I think for me of course the referee has to follow the rules," Haaland told Sky Sports. "This will give him three games, I feel bad for him, he gets three games, just give the goal don't give the red card. (But) it's the rules so this is how it is."

The Broader Implications for VAR in Football

This incident highlights the ongoing debate surrounding VAR's role in modern football, particularly in high-stakes matches. Halsey's analysis underscores the technical precision required in such decisions, even when they contradict the emotional momentum of the game. The controversy serves as a reminder of the complex balance between maintaining the spirit of the sport and enforcing its written laws, a challenge that continues to divide opinions among stakeholders at all levels of the game.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration