In a move that has reignited one of American entertainment's most bitter feuds, former President Donald Trump has launched a fresh, unsubstantiated attack on comedian Rosie O'Donnell, publicly questioning her US citizenship and demanding her deportation.
The Truth Social Tirade
The astonishing broadside was delivered via Trump's proprietary social media platform, Truth Social. In a post that has since gone viral, the former President alleged that the 'The View' co-host was a "bad citizen" and should have her citizenship status investigated, despite O'Donnell being a native-born American.
This is not the first time Trump has targeted O'Donnell, with a rivalry spanning over a decade marked by personal insults and public spats. However, the escalation to questioning a natural-born citizen's legal status marks a new and alarming chapter.
A Feud Forged in Fire
The animosity between the two public figures is well-documented, originating from O'Donnell's sharp critiques of Trump in the mid-2000s. Trump's retaliatory insults have often been intensely personal, frequently targeting O'Donnell's appearance and character on campaign trails and in media appearances.
This latest outburst, however, ventures into unprecedented territory by introducing a baseless legal and constitutional challenge against a private citizen, a move described by Westminster observers as highly irregular for a former head of state.
Legal Experts Dismiss Claims
Constitutional scholars and immigration lawyers were quick to dismiss Trump's claims as entirely without merit. Rosie O'Donnell was born in Commack, New York, in 1962, making her birthright citizenship unequivocal under the US Constitution.
Legal analysts have expressed concern that such rhetoric from a major political figure could undermine public understanding of fundamental constitutional principles and set a dangerous precedent for targeting political opponents.
Political Repercussions and Public Reaction
The bizarre demand has sent shockwaves through the political landscape, drawing reactions from across the spectrum. Critics have condemned the statement as a dangerous distraction and an example of Trump's penchant for personal vendettas.
Public reaction on social media has been a mix of outrage and disbelief, with many users highlighting the factual inaccuracy of the claim. The incident is seen by many commentators as part of a broader pattern of behaviour that continues to dominate and shape the American political discourse.
