Labour's Deputy Leader Angela Rayner has become the victim of what Sir Keir Starmer has condemned as "appalling vandalism" after her newly acquired seaside home was daubed with offensive graffiti labelling her a "tax evader."
The disturbing incident comes amid heightened scrutiny surrounding Rayner's tax affairs and previous property dealings, particularly concerning allegations she may have avoided paying stamp duty on a home sale.
Police Launch Investigation into Targeted Attack
Greater Manchester Police have confirmed they are investigating the criminal damage after the derogatory message was discovered spray-painted across the exterior of Rayner's property in Stockport. The vandalism specifically referenced the ongoing tax controversy that has dogged the Deputy Labour Leader in recent months.
Sir Keir Starmer swiftly came to his deputy's defence, stating: "This is appalling vandalism and completely unacceptable. There is no place for this kind of behaviour in our politics." The Labour leader emphasised that while political disagreements are inevitable, they must remain respectful and within the bounds of law.
Stamp Duty Controversy Background
The vandalism incident occurs against the backdrop of persistent questions about whether Rayner properly paid stamp duty land tax when she sold her former council house in Stockport in 2015. Critics have alleged she may have avoided thousands in taxes by falsely declaring the property as her principal residence.
Rayner has consistently denied any wrongdoing, maintaining that she complied with all tax rules and regulations. She has described the allegations as a "smear campaign" orchestrated by political opponents.
Political Reactions and Security Concerns
The attack has raised serious concerns about the safety of politicians and their families. A Labour spokesperson stated: "While Angela remains focused on holding the government to account, this incident highlights the increasing hostility faced by those in public life."
Security assessments for senior opposition figures are likely to be reviewed following this targeted attack, which represents a significant escalation in the personal nature of political disputes.
As investigations continue, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the volatile intersection between political scrutiny and personal safety in modern British politics.
