Fox News and the Wall Street Journal are under scrutiny after accusations emerged that they deliberately downplayed or censored reports linking former US President Donald Trump to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
According to sources, internal discussions at both media outlets allegedly discouraged in-depth coverage of Trump's associations with Epstein, despite extensive documentation and witness testimonies suggesting their acquaintance.
Media Blackout or Editorial Caution?
Critics argue that the reluctance to cover Trump's ties to Epstein reflects a broader trend of media bias, particularly among conservative-leaning outlets. Meanwhile, defenders claim editorial decisions were based on a lack of concrete evidence directly implicating Trump in Epstein's crimes.
Public and Political Reactions
The controversy has sparked outrage among media watchdogs and political commentators, who accuse Fox News and the Wall Street Journal of protecting Trump's image. Some lawmakers have called for investigations into potential conflicts of interest within these organisations.
As the debate intensifies, questions remain about the role of major news networks in shaping public perception and the ethical responsibilities of journalism in high-profile cases.
