The Democratic National Committee has launched an extraordinary broadside against presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr, condemning his recent comments about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal as "disgusting and deranged conspiracy theories" that dangerously undermine the trauma experienced by victims.
In a sharply worded statement that signals growing alarm within establishment Democratic circles, the DNC accused Kennedy of peddling "reprehensible and false claims" about the Epstein affair, which involved numerous high-profile figures in politics, business and royalty.
Campaign in Crisis Mode
The political firestorm erupted after Kennedy appeared to suggest during a podcast interview that the full truth about Epstein's operation remained obscured. While Kennedy's campaign subsequently claimed his comments were mischaracterised, the damage had already been done.
Democratic officials have expressed particular concern that Kennedy's remarks could potentially influence the 2024 presidential race, where he appears on ballots in several critical states despite running as an independent.
Victims' Trauma Exploited
At the heart of the DNC's condemnation is the assertion that Kennedy's rhetoric causes "immense harm" to Epstein's victims, many of whom have struggled for years to achieve justice and recognition of their suffering.
"These conspiracy theories are not only false but deeply damaging to those who have already endured unimaginable trauma," the statement read, emphasising the party's commitment to supporting survivors of sexual abuse and exploitation.
Establishment Backlash Intensifies
The remarkable public rebuke reflects mounting anxiety within Democratic ranks about Kennedy's potential to disrupt what many expect to be a closely contested election. Party strategists worry that his unorthodox campaign, combining progressive environmental policies with sceptical views on public health measures, could appeal to voters across the political spectrum.
This intervention represents the most direct and forceful effort to date to marginalise Kennedy and frame his candidacy as outside the boundaries of acceptable political discourse, particularly on sensitive issues involving abuse and exploitation.
As the controversy continues to develop, political analysts are watching closely to see whether this coordinated condemnation will diminish Kennedy's support or instead reinforce his image as an anti-establishment figure willing to challenge powerful institutions.
