DOJ Sues SeaWorld Parent Over Wheeled Walker Ban, Citing Disability Rights
DOJ Sues SeaWorld Over Wheeled Walker Ban

DOJ Files Lawsuit Against SeaWorld Parent Company Over Wheeled Walker Ban

The Department of Justice has initiated legal action against United Parks & Resorts, the parent company of SeaWorld and Busch Gardens theme parks. The lawsuit alleges that a prohibition on wheeled walkers equipped with seats at these parks constitutes a violation of civil rights legislation by discriminating against individuals with disabilities.

Legal Proceedings and Allegations

In a complaint filed on Thursday, the DOJ's civil rights division requested a jury trial in Orlando to adjudicate whether United Parks & Resorts has breached the Americans with Disabilities Act. The legal filing asserts that the company must revise its policies concerning rollators, as these devices are commonly known. Additionally, the department is seeking financial compensation for visitors who have been barred from using their wheeled walkers since the ban was enforced last November at a minimum of three parks located in Orlando and Tampa.

The complaint details specific instances where guests, including two military veterans with mobility impairments, were intercepted at security checkpoints and denied entry with their rollators. This action has sparked significant controversy, highlighting broader issues of accessibility in public venues.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Company's Response and Safety Concerns

United Parks & Resorts has publicly contested the allegations made by the Department of Justice. In a statement released via email on Thursday, the company indicated its intention to address the claims through formal legal channels. The firm defended its policy, stating it was implemented to mitigate repeated safety incidents resulting from the misuse of rollators with seats.

The policy at issue was designed to enhance guest safety while continuing to provide accessible options for all guests, the company explained. It further noted that alternative mobility aids are available at no additional cost to visitors, aiming to balance safety with inclusivity.

Broader Implications and Next Steps

This lawsuit underscores ongoing tensions between corporate safety protocols and disability rights enforcement. The outcome of the jury trial could set a precedent for how theme parks and similar attractions accommodate guests with mobility challenges under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Stakeholders, including disability advocacy groups, are closely monitoring the case, which may influence future regulations and industry standards.

As the legal process unfolds, both parties are preparing their arguments, with the DOJ emphasizing the need for equitable access and the company focusing on operational safety. The resolution of this dispute will likely have lasting effects on public accommodation policies across the entertainment sector.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration