In a stunning revelation that has rocked the corridors of power, former US President Donald Trump is alleged to have given incendiary advice to the new British Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, during their first phone call. According to sources, Trump advocated for a drastic and aggressive shift in UK foreign policy.
The core of Trump's advice, as reported, was a call for military confrontation. He purportedly suggested that Sir Keir should consider launching strikes against both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, two nations with which Britain has complex but long-standing diplomatic ties. This shocking proposition was framed by the former president as a method for the new UK leader to swiftly "get respect" on the global stage.
A Controversial Start to a New Relationship
The phone conversation, which took place shortly after Labour's landslide victory, was intended as a customary congratulatory call between allies. However, it quickly veered into unexpected territory. Trump's unsolicited and hawkish guidance has been met with bewilderment and concern by foreign policy experts and officials briefed on the discussion.
This advice stands in direct opposition to the stated foreign policy objectives of the new Labour government, which has emphasised a return to traditional, diplomatic "quiet pragmatism" rather than unilateral aggression.
The Invitation and The Fallout
Alongside the controversial advice, Trump extended a formal invitation for a full state visit to the United States. Such a visit would involve the full pomp and ceremony of a White House arrival ceremony and state dinner, a significant diplomatic honour.
Yet, the shadow of Trump's comments about Saudi Arabia creates a profound awkwardness. The Kingdom is a key strategic partner for both the UK and the US, particularly on matters of energy and regional security. Advocating for military action against a nation he once proudly sold arms to has been labelled as "baffling and irresponsible" by critics.
The revelations have ignited a fierce debate in London, prompting serious questions about the future of UK-US relations and the challenges of engaging with a figure known for his volatile and unconventional approach to international affairs.
